Saturday, March 2, 2019

Organization and Management Analysis Essay

organisational and watchfulness analysis atomic number 18 an innate part of validational environment. In the modern world, gaining environment characteristics atomic number 18 team work, delegation, teaching technology inter sides, which have an impact on the military capability of system and instruction. This helps in cost reduction, decrease in environmental waste, modify employee satisfaction and an increase in over each productivity. To have an organizational and write outment analysis review of organizational charts, meeting with department private instructors, executives or card members, and an organizational survey is necessary (J iodins, 2006). A multi-dimensional examination of organizational and steering analysis gives a complete picture of the actual part which stop be a starting point. This paper is to describe various organizational theories, comp bes executement theories and bearings, and explains which organizational supposition and watchfulness mood resembles our organization. Also, this paper explains what could be changed to make our organization better.Organizational TheoriesOrganizational scheme is to identify how they illuminate problems and how they maximize efficiency and productivity. These theories mostly derived from the activities of successful organizations. All of these theories contributes to the overall sagaciousness of management. As in both(prenominal) other theories organizational theories provide the priming coat for ongoing research and application of gay behavior in organizational get alongtings.Classical Organizational TheoryFocus on the theories of efficiency. The comp peerlessnts include scientific management, bureaucratic theory, and administrative theory. Scientific management focus on acquiring the better(p) from the people, equipment, and business. So that productivity can be increased. In this, the workers got scientifically selected, trained and taught for the work. On the other han d, bureaucratic theory focus on establishing a hierarchy, division of labor, rules, and regulations. In the current world, many an(prenominal) of the theater directors reckon that bureaucratic theory is a hindrance to employees creativity. Administrative theory establishes a set of management principles and functions that applied to the organizations. This serves as a centralizeddecision do approach (Coulter & Robbins, 2012).Neoclassical Organization TheoryThis theory emphasizes effective and sociopsychological aspects of human behaviors in an organization. As we see in many of the current organizations many of the managers motivate, lead, build trust, work with the team, manage conflicts is all based on the organizational performance approach. The bureau manager design jobs, work with the employees, the method of converse is general in the behavioral approach. Productivity increases in an environment with coherence of values and purpose. The key is to maintain equilibrium wh ere subordinates respect and believe managerial authority (Chron, 2014).Contingency TheoryThis is a management approach that recognizes severally organization as varied, which means that each organization faces dissimilar situations and waits diverse ways of managing. This helps the management to understand that there are no commonplace rules for managers to follow. Instead of looking into the universal rules, the manager must look on to the individual situation and determine the outgo and efficient way to manage the situation i dishly. variant changing circumstances require managers to consumption different approaches and techniques. There are no simple or complex rules to follow. coachs are able to take decisions based on the conditions (Coulter & Robbins, 2012).Systems TheoryThe system theory approach explains that organizations take information form the environment and transforms these resources into outputs into the environment. This theory explains the interrelation ship of all parts of an organization and how one change in one area can affect multiple other parts. In this, all the units work together to achieve the organizational goals. Organization depends upon inputs form capital, regime regulations, suppliers, information technology, human resources, to receive the output of financial impressions, products, services and information (Liebler & McConnel, 2012).Organizational theory suits our OrganizationThe organizational theory that closely resembles our organization is theContingency Theory. Adapting to the new changes in the environment is the basis for Contingency theory. This theory is important for managerial and organizational success. We have recently adopted electronic Medical Records, and we are in the adaptation stage of information technology. Manager takes decision based on the current circumstances, which is logical because the units within our organization differ in size, structure, capacity, work activities, and goals. So a universally satisfying theory will not work in all situations. Different situations require different theories of management. Some situation the division of labor and bureaucracy is desirable which supports the classic theory. Other situations structural design becomes effective. Depends on the situation the manager takes the stand. Contingency theory claims that there is no best way to design an organization. There is no written rule on what is the best or the universal solution for the problems in our organization. There is no best way to organize a corporation or to lead a company. Also, the theory that works in our organization may not work for other organizations (Coulter & Robbins, 2012).Compares Management Theories and StylesManagers communication with the subordinates reflects a cluster of styles which the management styles. Managers use different style in different situations. Generally, we can see one style generally emerges as the predominant mode of interaction. Autocr atic manager makes in bloodsucking decisions without much input from subordinates. The manager clearly dictates what, how, when and where things for the employees there is no room for employee initiatives. An dogmatic style is least effective and desirable for move employees. Another management style is the bureaucratic management style in which the manager follows the rule and ensures that the employees follow the rules as well . They go by the book and the rules and enforced strictly. In this, the employees enjoy less freedom. No exceptions permitted. Participative management is which the manager makes the final decisions, but the employees are involved in this process. two the manager and the employees involved in the decision making process. Decision do as a cohesive group interaction. Everyone might not deport managers decision. Another type is the Laissez-faire style in which the manager allows employees to manage their own work. No supervision provided. In this, theindiv iduals should be self-motivated. This can result in disorganization, chaos and lack of direction. Finally, in Paternalistic style the manager makes the decision to benefit the employees. Manager treats employees like children. In this style, the employees become dependent on their manager (Liebler & McConnell, 2012).Management Theory and Style suits our OrganizationIn our organization, there is no one management style that fits to all situations. In my observation, the managers shifts form one style to another when they face different groups and situations. When it comes to the policies and procedures, in my observation it is bureaucratic style, top level managers are following autocratic management style, and my immediate manager has a participative style who consults with the employees for decision making. So far I have not encountered any Laissez-faire management style in our place. In the new mesh orientation managers follow paternalistic style. For a successful manager, the ma nagement style depends on the given situation. If a work environment does not require any close supervision, the managers may select any styles. When employees are unskilled, autocratic style is most efficient. In the current world, changes impacts the managers task. It includes economical and political uncertainty, ethical issues, security threats, and changing technology. All these call for different management styles depends on the managers involvement.Changes towards Organizational AdvancementOrganizations deal with challenges in this worldwide economic climate, changing technology and increased globalization. A manager should understand the critical issues and use skills and abilities during challenging times in an organization. A great manager can change your life, encourage employees professionally and personally, energize people to overcome challenges and instill team spirit. Such a manager can make job enjoyable and productive. Manager should effect an environment in whic h the organization members can work to the best of their abilities and think creatively. In order to make the organization better people should support, coach, and pick up meaning and fulfilment in work. Also have up-to-date information about the new innovative ideas. It is important to be competitive and aliment in thebusiness world. Develop the net workings ability, communicate effectively and be aboveboard and genuine with others (Coutler & Robbins, 2012).ConclusionIn conclusion as we have seen in any organizational performance, managerial ability is very important in creating organizational values. Different management theories and styles range from prohibiting staff from making any decisions to fully delegating the decision-making power. No management style is consistently effective. Situational factors should be taken into consideration in the selection of an effective and efficient management style. The study of organizational theories and management styles is essential in this modern organizational, working environment.ReferencesChron. (2014). Organizational Theory. Retrieved from http//httpwww.smallbusiness.chron/organizational-theory. Coulter, M. & Robbins, S.P. (2012). Management. (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall. Jones, J. (2006). How to Analyze an Organizational Structure. Retrieved from http//www.smallbusiness.chron.com/analyze-organizational-structure-11818.html. Liebler, J.G. & McConnell C.R. (2012). Management Principles for Health Professionals. (6th ed.). Sudbury, MA Jones and Bartlett.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.